[MD] Chance
pholden at davtv.com
pholden at davtv.com
Wed May 14 09:03:24 PDT 2008
Quoting Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu>:
> [Platt]
> It fills in the knowledge gap left by appeals to "chance" which in
> effect means, "I don't know."
>
> [Arlo]
> "Chance" has nothing to do with "I don't know". Chance means without
> pre-planning, pre-ordainment or the active ordering of an
> "intelligent designer". "Chance" says that when the first two
> subatomic patterns united there was no pre-conceived "plan" or
> "purpose", they did so following only an undefined and unplanned
> "betterness". It was only AFTER the fact when the moment of "AHA!"
> hits, that these patterns become "stable".
>
> Despite the desire to turn Quality into Quali-god, an "intelligent
> designer" who ordered the universe specifically to bring Man,
> Glorious Man into being, and then sits back and revels in the
> splendor of Man's Free Will and Independence, it just ain't so.
> "Quality" is not a consciousness that gives on whit about whether or
> not "man" ever existed. The chance event(s) that ended the millions
> of years of dino rule was not part of a "Divine Plan of Quali-god" to
> turn dinos into oil and bring about the Reign of Man. For millions of
> years biological patterns followed Quality and all was Good. Chance
> shakes things up, and after the subsequent "AHA'S!" maybe something
> new will appear, or maybe not.
>
> Chance says there is not a "let's make a man", but rather an after
> the fact "wow! this works! let's keep it!". And should a passing
> asteroid smash into the Earth and end the Reign of Man, it will
> happen not out of Divine Plan nor will "Quality" care. Whatever
> patterns survive will continue to respond to "betterness", and maybe
> something new will appear, or maybe not. There is no plan, only after
> the fact patterns.
How do you know there's no plan? As far as Pirsig is concerned,
there may be a plan. "There is no quarrel whatsoever between the Metaphysics of
Quality and the Darwinian Theory of Evolution. Neither is there a quarrel between the
Metaphysics of Quality and the "teleological" theories which insist that life has
some purpose. What the Metaphysics of Quality has done is unite these opposed
doctrines within a larger metaphysical structure that accommodates both of them
without contradiction." (Lila, 11)
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list