[MD] Truth and the Linguistic Turn

[Ron Kulp]

Interesting Ron, Arlo,

This is leading us to the "immediate participation before (typically
objective)intellectualization" story (if we weren't already there),
but Ron,

Why do you say it [the immediate response to Quality] "makes the MoQ
questionable as to being axiomatic this way" ?
Could you elaborate / explain that point ? Are you suggesting it is
even more fundamental in some way than simply axiomatic of the MoQ ?
(and hence the misundersanding with Bo in another thread)

Ian

Ron:
It's kinda a circular logic thing Ian, that's why I say
It is questionable, but because the response to Quality
Or the quality event or even the simple term Quality itself
Means this experience of being alive, is the fundamental
Shall we say, aspect? Idea? See, even the words I use imply
An intellectual quality to a pre-existent phenomena that
Already exists.
I think in this way the "proof" of MoQ is experience itself.
We do not have to assume it for we ARE it.

Hope you get my meaning.

This is a good topic.