[MD] Academy

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Craig,

It is not something to argue about that is for sure!

Joe

On 5/15/08 1:52 AM, "craigerb at comcast.net" <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:

> [Joe]
>> In the history of thought a theory of knowledge precedes metaphysics.
>  
> [DM]
>> Does not every theory of knowledge assume a metaphysics
>> whereby it can make any judgements?
> 
> Here is the dilemma:  On the one hand, nothing is real unless
> it can be known/experienced.  So theory of knowledge precedes metaphysics.
> But on the other hand, we cannot know/experience anything that we don't know
> is possibly real.  So metaphysics must precede a theory of knowledge.
> Might it be that our theory of knowledge & our metaphysics must emerge
> together?
> Craig
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/