[MD] Academy

[Joseph Maurer]

On Saturday 17May 2008 12:26PM David M writes to Joe:

Hi Joe
 
Does not the idea that we even need epistemology presume a metaphuysics,
one that probably implies skepticism too?
 
David M

Hi David M and all:

³Culture hands me a set of glassesŠ.²   I know what other people accept.  I
take it on mechanically.  I am not skeptical, I am asleep!

I don¹t need metaphysics, I need a shock to wake me up.  In that scenario
everything is connected only ³conscious² and ³mechanical² are different. All
right I wake up!  My question is what awakened me?  Certainly not DQ/SQ¹s
relation to SOM, SOL.  Awakening, knowing, is different from metaphysics. I
am asleep, I don¹t have the slightest idea of what is defined, or undefined.
I have to wake up (asleep and awake are epistemology), what alarm clock can
I use?   I guess I am way behind the eight-ball in your scenario, that is
why I couldn¹t fathom your methodology.

Joe



On 5/17/08 12:26 PM, "David M" <davidint at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Joe
> 
> Does not the idea that we even need epistemology presume a metaphuysics,
> one that probably implies skepticism too?
> 
> David M