[MD] Quality Conversations

[david buchanan]

David M said:
...I, of course, started with Heidegger before discovering Pirsig. ...When Heidegger talks about Being as having been seen in terms of beings and mis-conceived I think it is useful to see this as Being as having been described in terms of SQ much as science does and misses half of reality that can only be understood in terms of DQ. Hence Being needs to be seen in a larger SQ/DQ context and not reduced to just SQ.

dmb says:
Its not clear what you're trying to say here. If you're saying that Being is not a thing, then you're just repeating what I already said - but in a much more confusing way. Or did I miss your point? 
_________________________________________________________________
Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_family_safety_052008