[MD] Quality Conversations

[David M]

Hi DMB

Simply this,when reading Heidegger you can use this as a possible
translation into Pirsig's terms: Being=Quality (including DQ), beings=SQ.
You may see it like this already or not?

David M


>
> David M said:
> ...I, of course, started with Heidegger before discovering Pirsig. ...When 
> Heidegger talks about Being as having been seen in terms of beings and 
> mis-conceived I think it is useful to see this as Being as having been 
> described in terms of SQ much as science does and misses half of reality 
> that can only be understood in terms of DQ. Hence Being needs to be seen 
> in a larger SQ/DQ context and not reduced to just SQ.
>
> dmb says:
> Its not clear what you're trying to say here. If you're saying that Being 
> is not a thing, then you're just repeating what I already said - but in a 
> much more confusing way. Or did I miss your point?
> _________________________________________________________________
> Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
> http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_family_safety_052008
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>