[MD] Chance
David M
davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Sat May 31 08:20:30 PDT 2008
Hi Ian
Yes I caught it, wish they'd get rid of Melvyn though,
he's a bit out of date.
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: "ian glendinning" <psybertron at gmail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Chance
> Dare I point out,
> that this weeks BBC "In Our Time"
> is on the subject of "probability"
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime.shtml
> Ian
>
> On 5/29/08, Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu> wrote:
>> [Platt]
>> But to the extent that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is undefinable,
>> one's behavior is free.
>>
>> [Arlo]
>> You've stated before that "only man responds to Dynamic Quality". Does
>> this
>> mean that man's behavior is the only thing in the universe that is not
>> deterministic?
>>
>> If not, since you've said a cat cannot respond to Dynamic Quality, how is
>> his behavior "free"? Or is your cat governed strictly by deterministic
>> laws?
>>
>> Or are you going to say now, and agree with me, that your cat can indeed
>> respond to DQ (making it "free" from deterministic laws, albeit "less
>> free"
>> than man whose respond to DQ includes social and intellectual level
>> affordances)?
>>
>> So which is it? Is your cat's behavior "free"? If so, is it because it
>> can
>> "follow Dynamic Quality"? And if not, how else can it be "free"?
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list