[MD] On the road to serfdom

[Platt Holden]

Hi All, 

Krimel engages in the usual leftist smear tactics in an attempt to 
intimidate anyone who dares consider the conservative values, in this case 
personally attacking Woods as being a fear monger, out of his depth, 
lacking discernment, not having a grip, not knowing how to get a grip, and 
befuddled.The smarmy arrogance of self-righteous lefties such as Krimel is 
a wonder to behold. By comparison, Pirsig's Rigel, the symbol of all those 
who go around posing as a moralists, is a piker. Was Krimel provoked into 
personally attacking Woods because Woods had previously attacked him? No.
But now, Woods is perfectly justified in responding in kind. 

Platt

> Krimel:
> Despotism? Again the fear mongering conservative dictionary seems not to
> have been written on Planet Earth.
> 
> woods:
>    It's called Obama's track record that I've posted here many 
> times recently.  He's voted for Bush on restricting freedoms.  
> Patriot Act, Wiretapping (oh, like that's not happening on non-terrorist
> like Bush promised, but it has been as the news has reported), he 
> wants to expand the military even more, calls for a civilian national 
> security force more well-funded than the military, calls to invade 
> Pakistan, Syria is on the list currently as we've seen so Obama will 
> have that, the World Banking System being discussed at the World 
> Summits, next one coming up soon (possibly one world currency 
> called for by Italian Prime Minister and French president), on and on, 
> if you really think Obama's going to go in and just do as he pleases, 
> yeah right...  
> 
> [Krimel]
> You recent forays into investigative politics have been mildly
> entertaining
> but sadly you seem way out of your depth. You grab this and that off the
> internet with not real discernment as to what is good information and
> what
> is dark fantasy. No one thinks anyone can go to Washington and do
> exactly
> what they please. But the president can change and reshape the agenda.
> The
> president can articulate a new vision for the country. A president with
> a
> sizable majority in congress can take us off the path of self indulgent
> head
> in the sand, tax breaks for Wall Street raiders and traders that we have
> had
> for the past 30 years.
> 
> [woods]
> If he can, without getting hurt, and nobody wants anybody 
> to get hurt in this forum, but Obama's out of his league if he thinks 
> he's going to change Washington.  He would need the backing of 
> the people more than the people are willing to give at the moment.  It 
> would take tremendous, daily support, but I'm sure the media won't 
> let us in on what's really happening in Washington.
> 
> [Krimel]
> If you think that no one can change Washington you are just wrong.
> Without
> taking an extended trip down memory lane, Roosevelt and Reagan both did
> it
> in alternating cycles of liberalism and conservatism that seem to last
> about
> 40 years. So thank God it is time for the pendulum to bring in a breath
> of
> fresh air.
> 
> [woods
>     I've posted enough on this subject and built a case against this 
> two-party system and corrupt D.C. with the Banking system (Fed. 
> Reserve, etc...), so I rest my case, it's in the archive, Krimel this 
> is bigger than your little democratic party and Obama and it would 
> take some really ground shaking events by anybody that goes 
> into the white house and Obama's not it... so as Platt said 
> we'll see....
> 
> [Krimel]
> Do you seriously think I am the least bit inclined to search through the
> archives for your posts that I filed away as unreadable in the first
> place?
> You have been working yourself into a frenzy about issues you don't have
> a
> grip on and don't even seem to know how to go about getting a grip on.
> Go
> vote for some craziod third party nutcase. Vote for McCain. Do whatever
> you
> want to do but for Christ sake calm down. The world is not coming to an
> end
> here. It is just shifting shape. Again. But I suspect you will be as
> befuddled by the new shape as by the old.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/