[MD] patterns revisited

[craigerb at comcast.net]

[Marsha]
> Names, definition and other 
> knowledge about trees and rocks is conceptually constructed patterns 
> of static value, on a flow of dynamic quality.

Yes, but don't mistake the menu for the food.
The names 'Colorado River' & 'Grand Canyon' are only a few centuries
old.  The concepts 'river' & 'canyon' a few centuries older than that.
But a river has been cutting thru that canyon for thousands upon
thousands of years.  If the river was conceptual, then as Pirsig says,
where was the concept:
"Sitting there, having no mass of its own, no energy of its own,
not in anyone’s mind because there wasn’t anyone, not in space
because there was no space either, not anywhere"
(ZMM, p.29)

[Marsha]
> Please suggest an inorganic spov that is not conceptual?

All of them.
Craig