[MD] The new autocracy

[Woods Woods]

Ham:
You bet, and it's because modern society has become leftist/liberal and is 
headed precipitously toward state socialism.



woods:
    It is socialism.  Ever since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, 
socialism has been regulating the free market through banking.  
Bureaucracy after bureaucracy has been trying to regulate the free market 
and without the little crashes purged from the system, these potential crashes 
have been propped up and let to live like zombies, with bailout after bailout 
especially in the 1970's on indebted insolvent banks, and big corporations (Lockheed, 
Chrysler, etc...) have been bailed out by the gov't to only received more 
bailout monies.  This is all due to regulations from the establishment 
of the Fed. Reserve that created moral hazards and through the New Deal moral 
hazards that have allowed bailouts and extreme risk taking to go on for decades 
since the U.S. gov't promises to back up all their loses with taxpayer money.  
Corporations and banks to this with the known support of 
Congress (Taxpayers) and Fed. Reserve (making money out of thin air - inflation), these 
business have been cracking and breaking the system layer by layer.
     The IMF and World Bank supported by taxpayer monies from mainly 
industrialized countries and U.S. being the top contributor has 
been using socialism in most developing countries to turn them 
from making their own food (sound free market with real assets) to crashing their 
markets (influx of IMF, corporate, Fed. Reserve of New York monies, mainly industrialized 
gov'ts (taxpayers paying the bill) to now they have to import most of their food 
(socialism through the banking doors crashing the sound economy losing all their 
assets to debts created and interest payments that go back to IMF, Fed. Reserve, 
corporations., and mainly Industrialized gov'ts (taxpayer paying the bill).

    It is socialism through the banking system, but other gov't regulations have 
been forced by IMF and other structures that lead into forcing gov't 
to comply with "structural developments" in their countries before their 
allowed to get more loans.  These "structural developments" are the gov't are 
to nationalize much in their countries such as farms, schools, etc...  IMF thus 
has been governing countries around the world through the banking system.  
All roads leading back to the biggest supporter, the biggest money maker, the U.S. 
Federal Reserve and Congress (making taxpayers eventually finish paying off 
all loans and debts from countries around the world).  It's been happening for over 
twenty years.  The last big push to socialize and dismantled this country was 
when many of the industries left this country and now this country doesn't produce 
hardly anything of its' own anymore, and now the economy can't engine itself 
out of this one.  That's why people are talking about building infrastructure, but 
in the Great Depression we had factories that made all the raw materials so 
the U.S. economy in all sectors benefited.  Building infrastructure will not 
work this time around if we get our raw materials and building supplies from 
China or some other foreign country.  But even then the U.S. economy still 
needed help but WW2 came and that was the last thing needed to pick up 
the economy.
  Two points - Federal Reserve made regulations that put the U.S. 
                     economy into the Great Depression and now this lastest 
                     downward spiraling of the economy (note Alan Greenspan in 
                     front of Congress a couple weeks ago admitting he made 
                     mistakes when he was Federal Reserve Chairman.  Mistakes 
                     that were the catalyst to this recent world economy crash).  Mistakes 
                     yeah right I say.  This has been planned for over 50 years with 
                     slow precision called "gradual socialism".
                   - Secondly RAND has recently gone to Congress to 
                     offer a plan that will fully get the U.S. economy 
                     up and running again - war.  RAND about two weeks 
                     ago said it would have to be a big war.  Bigger than Iran 
                     to help the economy.  Big like China, Russia, or Japan (yes, 
                     Japan was left on the table due to its' big savings (Japan has 
                     about 1 trillion dollars saved (yeah and the U.S. is trillions of 
                     dollar in debt) and U.S. indebtedness odd huh.).  In all likeliness 
                     Russia will be scoped, but who knows.  War might not be 
                     needed as people around the world continue to be docile to 
                     socialism crashing of the economies around the world.  But 
                     anyways ever since, the war beats have been a drummin' 
                     ever since Georgia and the U.S. tried to make people 
                     believe Russia started the recent fight with Georgia, but that's 
                     been established as a lie.  Like the war beats against Iran to 
                     stop the nuclear development, but meanwhile the U.S. is 
                     funding their nuclear development.


                     How socialism is bringing down the world and crashing 
it's economies through the Federal Reserve and the world banking system 
read:  "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin
                      Free market?  Free market?  Ever since 1913, any free market 
we had was crushed and put to waste by socialism.  This is socialism 
tearing the economy apart little by little around the world.  


woods 

P.S.   I agree with state socialism.  But I disagree with leftist being the cause.  
The right has been involved in establishing and usage of state socialism, too, 
over the decades.