[MD] The Menu/Reality issue

X Acto xacto at rocketmail.com
Wed Nov 12 06:42:29 PST 2008


Ron:
>  in effect, in your interpretation the order would be: 
> 1: MoQ (reality)
> 2: SOM (intellect) 
> 3: social
> 4: organic
> 5: inorganic


Bo:
Yes, it will look like this  ...  only I would put intellect (the level) in its 
proper place and put SOM in parenthesis. The MOQ is the DQ/SQ 
reality that replaces the former Subject/Object reality, so you see each 
level can be regarded as reality (or metaphysics) that has replaced the 
former.      



woods:
Long, long ago, in one of my first posts about Bo's SOL position I asked 
Bo if he knew Comte who made levels of history.  As a new historical 
period came about he made a new level.  Thus, history was linear 
and had a projectory along this linear line.  No interwining.  Bo of course 
ignored it, but this clearly shows he follows in the tradition of Comte.  It's 
not a negative thing, just a way to understand what Bo's saying.



Ron:
Woods, Bo,
Good point Woods, Bo clearly defines his reasoning in this statement
as the levels representing an evolutionary timeline. 

I immediately notice in this construction the one main MoQ notion
of Quality being undefined not being addressed with the assertion
of MoQ as reality. In Bo's interpretation, DQ/SQ IS the true manifestation
of ultimate reality.
Bo, in this interpretation, how does DQ/SQ (reality) function?
Does DQ represent motion and change and SQ consistencey
rigity and lack of motion? an Energy/matter  type of configuration?


      


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list