[MD] Here come the censors

[Woods Woods]

Ron:
Arlo is questioning the validity of the right to "keep and bear arms" in this country under the 
idea of defence against a corrupt government. Ideally, he has a point, tactically, resistance
in the form of harrassment of martial enforcement could incite riots. protest and the loss of
control from the inside out. Snipers and pipe bombs hurt morale.. The existence of a paramilitary
few coupled with black market enterprise along with organized crime, could make quite a mess
of things for the martial masters.
Woods is questioning the moral viability of bearing arms against another whether nuclear or conventional.
Such a thing could promote peace by an equal distribution of leathal power. Would crime drop
if everyone was a cop? perhaps.


woods:
    Thanks Ron for stepping in.  Arlo seems to be caught up in his thinking 
without stepping outside his thinking and notice where I'm coming from.  I think 
you've hit the nail on the head as to where exactly I'm coming from.  It's a deeper 
moral issue of people in general.  Thanks.

Ron:
As far as lines go Micah is on the money, opt out of that symantic trap. Lines are made to win arguements.
My Question is, which Arlo is drawing  what lines? does the hot pepper Arlo draw the same line as the
biker Arlo? or the beer brewing Arlo or the tanning on the beach Arlo.ect...ect... ad infinum
or is that line of contuity an illusion? a method for arguementation?
; )


woods:
  That's what I'm wondering.


may the force be with you hahahaha :-)
woods