[MD] The Menu/Reality issue

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Thu Nov 13 13:18:17 PST 2008


At 04:12 PM 11/13/2008, you wrote:
>Marsha
>I've explained my interpretation of SPoVs before.  I'm not sure that
>explaining again will make my explanation any clearer, but I'll
>try.  All SPoVs are named, conceptual analogues.  Inorganic and
>organic spovs are conceptual in nature but have as their _referent_
>external natural phenomenon.  Social and intellectual spovs are
>conceptual in nature and have as their _referent_ other complex
>constellation of interrelated spovs.
>
>[Krimel]
>I think I agree with this but every time I say something like this I get
>accused of SOM. What make your claim immune from the charge? After all you
>have mental concepts that _refer_ to something external.

I believe you think this external natural phenomenon is something 
like entities, TiTs.  To me, external, natural phenomenon is 
Quality.  Quality, which cannot be defined.  It's ALL Quality!

Marsha




.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list