[MD] The Menu/Reality issue
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Thu Nov 13 13:18:17 PST 2008
At 04:12 PM 11/13/2008, you wrote:
>Marsha
>I've explained my interpretation of SPoVs before. I'm not sure that
>explaining again will make my explanation any clearer, but I'll
>try. All SPoVs are named, conceptual analogues. Inorganic and
>organic spovs are conceptual in nature but have as their _referent_
>external natural phenomenon. Social and intellectual spovs are
>conceptual in nature and have as their _referent_ other complex
>constellation of interrelated spovs.
>
>[Krimel]
>I think I agree with this but every time I say something like this I get
>accused of SOM. What make your claim immune from the charge? After all you
>have mental concepts that _refer_ to something external.
I believe you think this external natural phenomenon is something
like entities, TiTs. To me, external, natural phenomenon is
Quality. Quality, which cannot be defined. It's ALL Quality!
Marsha
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list