[MD] Trance state

[MarshaV]

At 07:46 AM 11/15/2008, you wrote:
>Marsha:
>
>Well Andre, I don's see where you need assistance.  As far as I'm
>concerned you have it right.  Quality is indivisible, undefinable and
>unknowable.  But we divide it, define it and claim knowledge of it
>anyway.  That's the conventional way.  Once you realize this isn't it
>a marvel?
>Andre:
>
>Thank you Marsha, and further to the Frogs into princes stuff, please
>correct me if my interpretation of NLP does not ring true, look right or
>feel okay for you ( I have to use my memory, not having the books with me).

It seems to me that nlp is directed towards social/psychological 
problem solving, but does sound even more interesting when considered 
from a DQ/sq perspective.   I haven't found The Structure of Magic 
yet.  I'm thinking it might expand application.



>And my other twist to Roger Waters'  'Give any species too much rope and
>they'll  fuck it up' is substitute the word 'species' for level.

I'm not sure what you mean???


Marsha


p.s.  My constructed and remembered visual were opposite of the 
"norm"  that's why I was looking for information on ocular 
dominance.  -  And I noticed that RMP has used the word 'sound' a lot 
in LILA.  Very auditory, though I haven't investigated in an great detail.












.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.