[MD] opposing view to zeigeist

[David M]

Hi Krim

I take your point, but is not one important aspect of our
world the way the economic game-competition is played, and are there
not many players with little power and others/few with much power,
even power to effect the rules of the game? And therefore a minority
who do particularly well and therefore having a stronger interest in
keeping the game pretty much as it is. Of course, the strong players
do not have reliable control and may even over play their hand.
One hope we have is that our information and understanding as
a community is improving although not enough yet.

DM


> woods:
> I do have one question actually.  Are you
> therefore a zeigeist believer?  I brought this
> up due to zeigeist thrown around on this forum
> and thought an opposing view would be good.
>
> [Krimel]
> I have found your recent rants on conspiracy and fringe politics amusing. 
> I
> don't know where you got the idea I believe in UFO. Or perhaps you could
> point me to a time when I referenced a sci-fi magazine. But its OK I am
> easily misunderstood.
>
> The only common feature I can see in your recent spate of fringe posts is
> that they seem to originate from the Myth of Control. That would be the 
> idea
> that some group of powerful people or beings is manipulating world events
> for arcane purposes of their own. You know, messing with economic
> institutions, blowing up building, starting wars, worshiping Satan...
>
> I find these views overly optimistic. It would be wonderful if something 
> or
> someone actually were in control. If you can nail down such a cabal of
> Machiavellians be sure an provide a link, I am ready to sign up with them.
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>