[MD] Emotions' place?

[MarshaV]

At 10:36 AM 10/26/2008, you wrote:
>Mel:
>
>Our experience of emotions is heavily and profoundly physically.
>It does not follow, however, that they are restricted to only that.
>I believe that it can be shown that we CAN choose to feel at least
>some emotions.
>(e.g. Horror movies, romance novels, symphonies, arts in general)
>
>Andre: I am itching...to jump in and do
>
>NLP wil totally agree and will go further than that. It suggests that
>emotions are the result of the way one puts the static patterns together
>after the DQ experience. Once you know what particular pattern results in
>what emotion, you can change i.e. control it. These are different to
>different individuals.
>Quite simply because one DQ experience can be traumatic for one person
>whilst it can be a relief for another person.
>
>Note I am not talking about the DQ pre-intellectual experience. I am talking
>about the observation that static emotional PoV's can be controlled and
>therefore changed.
>
>Just a thought
>Andre


Andre,

I am planning to find my old copy of Frogs into Princes.  I'll look 
for it after the election.  I cannot believe there isn't more 
interest.  I think you might have to use dynamic language.

Marsha







.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.