[MD] the empire

Arlo Bensinger ajb102 at psu.edu
Tue Oct 28 09:56:46 PDT 2008


[Platt]
You claim tolerance and yet are intolerant of those who don't agree 
with your wacko left-wing Marxist "share the wealth" views, like Ham 
and me. That is blatant hypocrisy. You can run, divert and obfuscate, 
but you can't hide.

[Arlo]
Ah, so we are having the "being intolerant of my intolerance makes 
you intolerant" cry session again. As with moaning about "personal 
attacks", its funny when those who ideology is based on intolerance 
cry about people being intolerant of their views. You reap what you sow.

And for what its worth, I don't think Craig or Micah would accuse me 
of being intolerant to their views, even where we disagree. Its only 
whack-job loons like you and Ham and your ridiculously offensive 
ideological vitriol that draw my ire. So you can accuse me of being 
intolerant of opposing views all you want, it just ain't true, as I 
would hope Craig and Micah would both attest.

The only thing I am intolerant of the anti-intellectual bile you guys 
post. And if that makes me "intolerant" in your eyes, then cry me a 
river, as that rings hollow coming from someone who makes intolerance 
the cornerstone of their Weltanschauung.

And as for my "intolerance of intolerance", I've never claimed 
otherwise, I've never claimed I was "tolerant of intolerance" (unless 
you care to show me where, some evidence? a quote? something?), so 
your claims of hypocrisy are empty. Indeed, I've never claimed to 
tolerate everyone, and I've never claimed we should. What I say is 
that we return tolerance tit for tat. If someone tolerates me, I 
tolerate them equally. If someone is intolerant towards me, I do not 
tolerate that at all.

Your hypocrisy, however, is unquestionable. Your ideology is based on 
intolerance. You cry when people don't tolerate you. Hypocrisy. Plain 
and simple.






At 12:25 PM 10/28/2008, you wrote:
> > [Platt]
> > Yeah, blame Ham or anyone else who doesn't think like you.
> >
> > [Arlo]
> > This is exactly what you and Ham do. Are we going to have "you are
> > intolerant of my intolerance, so I will now condemn you for being
> > intolerant" discussion again?
> >
> > [Platt]
> > I'm shocked and offended. Quality doesn't get much lower than that.
> >
> > [Arlo]
> > Your hypocrisy is much lower. Those who base their ideology on being
> > intolerant of others, should not cry when their own views are not
> > tolerated.
>
>You claim tolerance and yet are intolerant of those who don't agree with
>your wacko left-wing Marxist "share the wealth" views, like Ham and me.
>That is blatant hypocrisy. You can run, divert and obfuscate, but you can't
>hide.
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list