[MD] the empire

Arlo Bensinger ajb102 at psu.edu
Wed Oct 29 10:15:33 PDT 2008


[Platt]
Your truth speaks to incipient tyrants bent on liberal fascism.

[Arlo]
Now I'm a "tyrant"?! Woohoo! I suppose commie, Marxist, traitor, 
anti-freedom, enemy of liberty, evil academic hippy enslaver of man 
was not enough. Or, wait, was "tyrant" the word-of-the-day on the 
Hannity Program? "Liberal fascism"... hehe, too funny.

[Platt]
Expect the usual hate-filled reactions and nonsensical queries.

[Arlo]
Read "answering the questions exposes us for the anti-intellectual 
bigots we are, better to throw sand in the eyes and run".

Or you can answer the questions we know Ham won't. (You won't either. Coward.)

Ham said, "[multiculturalism] alters our traditional value system to 
make discrimination in any form immoral", pointing out that 
"multiculturalism" derived from school desegregation. Do you think 
that school desegregation was moral? A "good form of 
multiculturalism"? Or do you believe school desegragation to have been immoral?

Ham also said, "The object [of multicultralism] is to render society 
colorblind to cultural and racial differences." Can you articulate 
some "racial differences" you feel are important? Can you point out 
some "racial differences" we should not be "colorblind" to?

Ham said, "Thus, all people are viewed as equal and no nation is 
culturally superior to any other." Do you believe that some people 
are superior to others? And some inferior? What do you base the worth 
of the individual on? What makes some people "better" or "superior" 
to others? (By the way, "multiculturalism" does not pretend that all 
people are equally skilled in, e.g., playing the violin, but it does 
promote that the worth of life is "equal" for all people. Agree or disagree?)

Or you can try to justify calling my questions "hate-filled" (where 
is the hate?) or nonsensical (they are logically straight-forward).




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list