[MD] Painting

[MarshaV]

At 09:15 AM 10/30/2008, you wrote:
>Marsha:
>thinking about this, I have come to the conclusion that I should have
>the same privilege (outside the classroom) to paint nude men.  So
>what's stopping me.  I have a feeling it is easier for gay men to
>paint nude men than it is for women to paint nude men.
>
>Andre:
>
>Whatever turns you on Marsha and I do not mean this in a derogatory sense. I
>have always felt very awkward about men-bodies.
>Women's bodies are much more elegant, streamlined, aesthetically
>pleasing..all reproductive stuff  tucked neatly, efficiently, compacted
>inside. A brilliant biological pattern. Very caring arrangement.
>Men are just...how to say this...lump! I do think "we" cannot match  female
>pulchritude
>
>But I am a bloke and not gay i.e not in a sexual sense.


And about decade ago I spent a few years with a 20-something, young 
man.  I can only say it inspired much poetry.  I have no problem with 
my own definition of beauty.   In spite of a women being 
indoctrinated sense of propriety, men and women are not so different.

  Marsha



>Andre
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.