[MD] Core problemS

[Krimel]

Ham,
FYI, the MoQ IS a virtual reality game.
Krimel


Hi Ron --

I'm still waiting for you to explain the term "prescriptive meaning" which 
you have used in critiquing my "phenomenalistic" philosophy and some 
proposed constructions of Pirsig's levels. Specifically, how does 
prescriptive meaning differ from "conceptual" or "descriptive" meaning?

By the way, I agree with your statement to Krimel that virtual reality games

are "for morons who assume that one has enhanced the illusion of reality by 
clinging to some sense of self and personal identity in a format where 
neither are the least bit meaningful."

Thanks and regards,
Ham



> Ron --
>
>> I believe phenomenalism characterizes the theory rather well.
>> As you most pragmatically suggested, focus on the "reality experience"
>> does disperse all intellectual quandaries and conflicts.
>> Nice observation Ham, Marsha's post certainly pertains to this.
>> This is certainly, understanding the larger scope of the issue.
>>
>> My focus was on the inconsistency of theory. As we discussed
>> before, when providing prescriptive meaning, especially at this level
>> of abstraction, it is important to have consistency of meaning. When
>> concepts get reduced these inconsistencies become exaggerated.
>
> Appreciate your comments.  I assume you agree that "the reality 
> experience" has some dialectical advantages over a "taxonomy" of reality 
> as a discussion topic.  Would you kindly explain "prescriptive meaning" 
> for me?  You used this term in your previous critique of my logic, and I'm

> not sure how it differs from "conceptual" or "descriptive" meaning.
>
> Thanks, again, Ron.
>
> Best regards,
> Ham

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/