[MD] Can DQ be Bad?
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Thu Sep 11 06:10:06 PDT 2008
At 08:51 AM 9/11/2008, you wrote:
>dmb said:
>Yes, Krimel, DQ has a negative face. Chaos and confusion and degeneracy
>ensues when things are too dynamic.
>
>Krimel replied:
>At last, perhaps the MoQ can move forward.
>
>dmb replies to the reply:
>The MOQ can move forward? This negative aspect of DQ has been part of the
>MOQ since the day it was published. Sitting on hot stoves is no picnic, for
>example.
>
>[Krimel]
>Unbelievably, dmb and I seem to have found some common ground. Before it
>turns to quicksand, who will join us in admitting that DQ is not always
>"Good" or even "good"?
Krimel,
Disagree. DQ is beyond description.
Where's you ventriloquist?
Marsha
p.s. This will be totally uninteresting to most of you, but I just
changed my mail alert to the theme from Dudley DoRight of Bullwinkle
fame. It sets receiving mail from you guys on a more optimistic note.
.
.
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list