[MD] Can DQ be Bad?

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Thu Sep 11 06:10:06 PDT 2008


At 08:51 AM 9/11/2008, you wrote:
>dmb said:
>Yes, Krimel, DQ has a negative face. Chaos and confusion and degeneracy
>ensues when things are too dynamic.
>
>Krimel replied:
>At last, perhaps the MoQ can move forward.
>
>dmb replies to the reply:
>The MOQ can move forward? This negative aspect of DQ has been part of the
>MOQ since the day it was published. Sitting on hot stoves is no picnic, for
>example.
>
>[Krimel]
>Unbelievably, dmb and I seem to have found some common ground. Before it
>turns to quicksand, who will join us in admitting that DQ is not always
>"Good" or even "good"?

Krimel,

Disagree.  DQ is beyond description.

Where's you ventriloquist?

Marsha



p.s.  This will be totally uninteresting to most of you, but I just 
changed my mail alert to the theme from Dudley DoRight of Bullwinkle 
fame.  It sets receiving mail from you guys on a more optimistic note.






.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
. 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list