[MD] Can DQ be Bad?

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

Margaret!

I liked your post.

This:
> there is DQ BECAUSE we have SQ...or vice versa.


is excactly what I mean.

> i.e. there has to be some static pattern before something dynamic can 
> occur
> to change it and vice versa.


But, DQ is not some force that swoops in and changes things around. it is 
always there, constant, and it is the movement of the SQ patterns that 
decides if they can perceive it, and how much of it they can perceive.

> and both events/patterns are still a duality that our minds have defined
>
> deciding an event or pattern is good or bad is also our choice of how to
> describe whatever our perception of the pattern is...just like everyone 
> here
> bickering over identities for the past few days -
>
> some people might perceive an event as DQ and some might see it as Static
> (from some previous pattern they recognize) - and then, some might see 
> that
> event as good and some might see it as bad.
>
> I think that events/patterns are neither good/bad (all can be described as
> positive or negative or both) AND all events can be both DQ and SQ
> simultaneously.
>
> we resonate with other entities who share similar perceptions and learn a
> lot from those entities who have differing perceptions

Yes, I agree I think. And I would add, that the Good that is pure 
Quality/dynamic quality is what keeps the static patterns going, because 
everything moves toward what they thing quality is, that is from their 
static and flawed point of view. so when they see another aspect of Good, 
well, then that's dynamic indeed, but the Good was always there, infinitely 
greater in its whole than they can know/understand/perceive.

I think. This way we don't make Plato's mistake.

Regards

Chris