[MD] What's missing from SOM?

[David M]

> Ron: 
> But Pirsig isn't concerned with identity,
> he is concerned with the original concept
> That which is continuous and consistent
> in flux and how this concept turned into
> a collection of assumptions we know as SOM


DM: So from the MOQ what does SOM look like?
To me it looks like SOM is only interested in SQ and
forgets the larger quality/DQ context. It also become 
obsessed with the first two levels of SQ and values
them more than the higher levels of SQ, seeing the
higher levels of SQ as somehow unreal and dependent.
MOQ put the DQ back and see the SQ in a wider context 
with no devaluation of any of the levels -more pluralistic.