[MD] Discrete & Dependent

[Magnus Berg]

Hi Bo

> Pirsig actually said: 
> 
>     There has been a tendency to extend the meaning of 
>     "social" down into the biological with the assertion that, for 
>     example, ants are social, but I have argued that this 
>     extends the meaning to a point where it is useless for 
>     classification. I said that even atoms can be called 
>     societies of electrons and protons. And since everything is 
>     thus social, why even have the word? I think the same 
>     happens to the term, "intellectual," when one extends it 
>     much before the Ancient Greeks.*  
> 
> The last part you and the rest of the discussion should heed 
> because on the intellectual issue you are as far off as Magnus on 
> the social (he is lost on the intellectual too, but never mind) This 
> underpins the SOL interpretation. The Ancient Greeks is in a MOQ 
> context means SOM.

It's getting very tedious to answer this exact same question over and over 
again! It makes me wonder if you've really read my essay, or my previous replies 
to the question.

Social value is the force that keeps things together when there's no other 
explanation, such as biological or inorganic.

What is so hard to understand about that?

	Magnus