[MD] Many Avatars, Many Selves
Ron Kulp
RKulp at ebwalshinc.com
Tue Sep 16 12:37:11 PDT 2008
[Ron]
But you still evade the question of responsibility. You divert to
questions of identity once again.
[Arlo]
Okay, fair enough. I though I answered this already, but you don't
think I have. I'll take another crack at it.
Ron;
now we're getting somewhere.
Arlo:
Responsibility is social law, Ron, and this law is based on the
belief that there is a thread of continuity running through all the
selves that inhabit a particular brain. We agree, socially, that this
continuity exists and therefore can punish the "entirety" of the
selves in a brain for the actions of any one. I agree with this, and
find it a necessary law to preserve social stability. I've said
several times in this thread that holding the illusion of "the real
Arlo" accountable for the actions of any one of his many "pretend
faces" is just and necessary social law.
Ron;
Seeing how the human condition is defined by social level patterns
, I'd say you confuse the term illusion with hallucination. An illusion
is
a distortion, it exists but not as perceived. Consequently
"self" exists but not in the way our society perceives it.
as a singularity of mind/body
No?
Arlo:
What I am pointing out, over and over, is that this thread of
continuity is not real, its an illusion. A valuable one, to be sure,
and one we NEED to ensure social stability. But we have to be very
careful we don't start seeing this illusion as a dogmatic reality. It
serves us, we should not be serving it.
Does this answer your question?
Ron;
Got it, and then some.
Arlo:
In other words, in cases where social stability is threatened we use
this illusion to preserve our social world. In cases where this is
not the case, we need to step back and see that this thread of
continuity has no existence apart from the immediate, contextual
activities of the moment. When social stability is threatened, we can
lock up "Mark" for the crimes of "Julia". But otherwise, when we
really think about "Mark" and "Julia" we must remember that the
illusion of continuity we build is only a social convention and not
some absolute real self pretending to be someone else.
[Ron says of "the source"]
That ball of yarn with many faces which the words and ideas you
submit originate from.
[Arlo]
You are saying, if I understand, that the "source" is the sum-total
of all our "selves"? And it includes our physiology as well?
Ron:
Yes, what is left sans social convention? is the biological pattern
Arlo, Nope. What else is there other than the "illusion" of social
convention?
nothing.
So I offer that the social convention is "self" with all the percs and
responsibilities that entails which includes (in our society) integrity
and
honesty as essential values.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list