[MD] Being-Aware
craigerb at comcast.net
craigerb at comcast.net
Thu Sep 25 23:11:08 PDT 2008
[Ham]
> 'being' and 'becoming' are defined by most dictionaries as "the state or
> quality of having or coming into existence."
It would be clearer to say: 'being' is defined as "the state or
quality of having existence" & 'becoming' is defined as "the state or
quality of coming into existence."
[Ham]
> That makes it fundamental by definition.
These definitions don't say anything as to what is fundamental.
[Ham]
> "Awareness" is defined as the realization, perception, or apprehension of
> what we know.
CAUTION: defining 'awareness' in terms knowledge (so that knowledge
is more fundamental than/prior to awareness) may have unwanted
consequences.
[Ham]
> we know that being exists only because we are aware of it
See, how quickly you've reversed the priority.
[Ham, reconstructed]
> 1) we know that being exists only because we are aware of it
> 2) whatever knows that being exists only because it is aware of it,
> is fundamentally a being-aware.
> 3) :. each cognizant individual is fundamentally a being-aware.
You have provided no support for 2).
[Ham]
> being in existence takes the form of a sensible (cognizant,
> knowing) agent or entity who becomes aware of being, the locus of which is
> his/her self and its knowledge of a diversity of other beings.
At this point you've stopped defining/analyzing & just resort to assertion.
[Ham]
> fundamentally Existence = Being-Aware.
So everything that exists is aware (rocks, plants, the color green,
democracy, etc.)
Craig
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list