[MD] Can DQ be Bad?

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Fri Sep 19 02:35:06 PDT 2008


At 03:47 PM 9/17/2008, you wrote:

>dmb says:
>Its easy to confuse biological quality with dynamic quality because 
>neither is cognitive. That is one of the biggest mistakes made by 
>intellectuals and hippies. There have been tons of Buddhist guru 
>types who've destroyed themselves with sex scandals. I asked Pirsig 
>about that once and he explained in those basic terms. The guru and 
>his student are engaged in practices that facilitate the dynamic and 
>spontaneous modes of consciousness anyway, of course. And if it's 
>working, everything in their lives gets shaken loose, everything 
>starts to look especially delicious and then, Wham! They end of in 
>bed, probably falling in love too, and sometime it gets really, 
>really wild. I mean criminal, Krimel.



Hierogamy?   My, my!   Life is so messy.










.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
. 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list