[MD] Can DQ be Bad?
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Fri Sep 19 02:35:06 PDT 2008
At 03:47 PM 9/17/2008, you wrote:
>dmb says:
>Its easy to confuse biological quality with dynamic quality because
>neither is cognitive. That is one of the biggest mistakes made by
>intellectuals and hippies. There have been tons of Buddhist guru
>types who've destroyed themselves with sex scandals. I asked Pirsig
>about that once and he explained in those basic terms. The guru and
>his student are engaged in practices that facilitate the dynamic and
>spontaneous modes of consciousness anyway, of course. And if it's
>working, everything in their lives gets shaken loose, everything
>starts to look especially delicious and then, Wham! They end of in
>bed, probably falling in love too, and sometime it gets really,
>really wild. I mean criminal, Krimel.
Hierogamy? My, my! Life is so messy.
.
.
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list