[MD] Discrete & Dependent

[MarshaV]

At 07:16 AM 9/19/2008, you wrote:
>Hi Marsha, thanks for commenting.
>
>>At 05:56 AM 9/19/2008, Magnus wrote:
>>
>>>I think you and many others are making it way too easy for 
>>>yourselves. You only care to solve one particular problem you set 
>>>your sights on, but the rest is just left as a pile of rubbish.
>>
>>Magnus,
>>This statement is just plain wrong.  What is this pile of rubbish 
>>you are so worried about?
>
>Take for example Bo. He has set his sight on his version of the 
>intellectual level and states it's the ability to distinguish 
>between the "subjective experience of sensing external objects" and 
>the "objective internal representation of that object".
>
>What are lost here is the object itself. You're usually complaining 
>about Bo's inability to distinguish between "the moon" and "pointing 
>at the moon", right?
>
>That's the pile of rubbish I was referring to. The moon itself isn't 
>even included in Bo's metaphysics.
>
>Using the levels, we're supposed to be able to categorize everything 
>in our reality. But if you construct a set of levels in which some 
>things aren't included, that set of levels can't be correct.
>
>         Magnus


Hi Magnus,

First, sorry for implying your statement was wrong.  That was too harsh.

You wrote "I think you (Bo) and many others"?  Who else are you addressing?

You are not talking about things-in-themselves, are you?  Because 
they do no exist within the MOQ.  Right?  This is, of course, related 
to my question in the Pattern thread.


Marsha




.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.