[MD] The Quest for Quality

[Margaret Warren]

Hi Magnus,

I just wondered if there weren't some 
common ground between Ham and his essentialism
and the MoQ'ers? 

It would really help me to read a simple, concrete
set of examples of what makes the two philosophies
so completely opposed to each other. 

I think that a philosophy has
to be such that a child can basically grasp it. 

mm


> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org [mailto:moq_discuss-
> bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Magnus Berg
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 1:14 AM
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] The Quest for Quality
> 
> Hi Margaret
> 
> Ham Priday wrote:
> > I agree with your approach to this forum, and tend to do the same.
> > Unfortunately, there are a few posters who get their kicks from creative
> > insults, especially when an opponent expresses something regarded as
> > heretical to the MoQ.  (I happen to be among the victims.)
> 
> Another point of view is that Ham is the original attacker. He sounds so
> smooth
> but what he really wants to do is to smother the MoQ and turn everyone to
> him
> and talk about his precious essentialism.
> 
> I say, make a forum of his own and talk about it there. It's basic
> netiquette
> (how everyone ought to behave on the internet).
> 
> 	Magnus
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1678 - Release Date: 9/18/2008
> 9:01 AM