[MD] Being-Aware
Ham Priday
hampday1 at verizon.net
Wed Sep 24 11:14:50 PDT 2008
Hi Marsha --
> The MOQ starts with experience. Experience is reality.
If you're going to stick with this terminology, you will have to define what
you mean by "experience".
I would define it as the awareness of being. Experience by itself is a
malapropism. We cannot experience nothing, All experience is awareness of
something. By my previous analysis, that "some-thing" is being Therefore,
experiential reality (existence) is being-aware, and we are the beings
aware.
The purpose of my analysis is to reduce assertions to fundamental
propositions. I agree that physical existence is experiential, but unless
we all agree as to what experience is, it's just another ambiguous word that
could mean "imagining", "feeling", "sensibility", or "general knowledge".
Indefiniteness spawns confusion.
Can you accept "being-aware" as my definition for experiential reality, at
least for purposes of this discussion? If not, tell me why.
Thanks Marsha,
Ham
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list