[MD] Being-Aware

Ham Priday hampday1 at verizon.net
Wed Sep 24 11:14:50 PDT 2008


Hi Marsha --


> The MOQ starts with experience.  Experience is reality.

If you're going to stick with this terminology, you will have to define what 
you mean by "experience".

I would define it as the awareness of being.  Experience by itself is a 
malapropism.  We cannot experience nothing,  All experience is awareness of 
something.  By my previous analysis, that "some-thing" is being   Therefore, 
experiential reality (existence) is being-aware, and we are the beings 
aware.

The purpose of my analysis is to reduce assertions to fundamental 
propositions.  I agree that physical existence is experiential, but unless 
we all agree as to what experience is, it's just another ambiguous word that 
could mean "imagining", "feeling", "sensibility", or "general knowledge". 
Indefiniteness spawns confusion.

Can you accept "being-aware" as my definition for experiential reality, at 
least for purposes of this discussion?   If not, tell me why.

Thanks Marsha,
Ham





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list