[MD] Being-Aware
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Wed Sep 24 12:37:11 PDT 2008
to expand a tiny bit...
At 02:14 PM 9/24/2008, you wrote:
>Hi Marsha --
>
>
>>The MOQ starts with experience. Experience is reality.
>
>If you're going to stick with this terminology, you will have to
>define what you mean by "experience".
>
>I would define it as the awareness of being. Experience by itself
>is a malapropism. We cannot experience nothing, All experience is
>awareness of something. By my previous analysis, that "some-thing"
>is being Therefore, experiential reality (existence) is
>being-aware, and we are the beings aware.
>
>The purpose of my analysis is to reduce assertions to fundamental
>propositions. I agree that physical existence is experiential, but
>unless we all agree as to what experience is, it's just another
>ambiguous word that could mean "imagining", "feeling",
>"sensibility", or "general knowledge". Indefiniteness spawns confusion.
>
>Can you accept "being-aware" as my definition for experiential
>reality, at least for purposes of this discussion? If not, tell me why.
Hello Ham,
Right from the dictionary: Experience
5. Philosophy. the totality of the cognitions given by perception;
all that is perceived, understood, and remembered.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/experience
Why is this a problem? Why don't you accept experience as reality?
Marsha
.
.
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list