[MD] Being-Aware
Ham Priday
hampday1 at verizon.net
Mon Sep 29 10:37:41 PDT 2008
Krimel (and Marsha) --
As the initiator of this thread, I feel obliged to add some clarity to the
controversy which seems to have ended in a brawl.
On 9/25 this exchange was posted between you and Marsha . ..
[Marsha]:
> There are six senses: sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste and
> mind. Perceptual awareness may be of a mental pattern.
> These six senses of perception seem to cover everything.
[Krimel]:
> The number of senses is a bit arbitrary. Them as several senses
> that get lumped under touch: pain, proprioception, balance, and
> heat to name the most obvious. But "mind" is most assuredly
> not a "sense".
>
> Sensation refers to the activation of the various receptor cells
> in our bodies that convert energy from the environment, (light,
> motion and chemistry) into nervous impulses.
>
> Perception is an entirely different process but I often fear that
> people here either do not understand or do not recognize the
> distinction.
Marsha, I won't comment on your characterization of Krimel, but I side with
him on this issue.
It's ironic that Psychology, which began as a study [ology] of the mind or
"soul" [psyche], now rejects the most self-evident of human attributes and
regards "mental processes" as a product of biogenetic, neuro-physiological,
and sociological development.
I don't pretend to know how Buddhists "study" the mind. But it appears
that, like the objectivists, they dismiss "selfness" and relegate
proprietary awareness to the natural world (or its pantheistic equivalent).
Mind is not a "sense". It is the cognitive awareness of all sensation
relative to (i.e., identified with) a specific organism. Mind is the
'Knower' of experience, which is neither a sensation nor a perception, but
self-awareness whose contents and organic locus relate to the appearance of
being. Fundamentally speaking, mind is being-aware.
Finite existence is differentiated temporally, spatially, and materially by
the intellect. Existence is a subject/object dichotomy. Every individual
is separated from every other object of its experience, as well as from the
primary source of reality. The essential link that binds the subject to its
source is not finitude but Value. Experience, in conjunction with
intellection, is what brings value into existence as Being. In that sense,
we are all creators of our universe.
Again, I submit that man is essentially value-sensibility and functionally a
being-aware.
Thanks for your efforts and peace to you both,
Ham
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list