[MD] Subject: Re: A Rally Speech

[skutvik at online.no]

Andre & Cristoffer 

30 Sep. Andre wrote:

> My understanding of the matter is that everyone dislike to many of the
> others view too much for this to be possible. Some here don't even
> agree with the fundamentals. But perhaps that isn't relevant, at least
> not right now. I think, that the spreading of the general idea is the
> most important thing still, and for that we have Lila. Bodvar feels,
> and I agree, that we need proper definitions of the levels to be able
> to seriously promote this view - the only problem is that here is
> where we REALLY differ in opinion.

Welcome to the bedlam Andre good to have another European on 
board, and thanks to Chris for mentioning me (agreement there) I read 
you introduction Andre and I used to welcome newcomers before, but 
after ten years of discussing the MOQ and being a septuagenarian 
now, I'm reeling.    

Regarding finances and politics I always feel out of my depth, but I 
think it's beyond MOQ's depth too it's mesh far to coarse to catch if 
one financial institution is "intellect" and another "social" or if capitalism 
is dynamic in addition. However as I discuss with the other veteran 
(not of age) Magnus the MOQ can't improve on science but it will 
certainly influence our way of regarding science - THAT most of all 
because it is intellect's spearhead and intellect a "level" only known in 
the MOQ. OK here I go again ;-)

Bodvar