[MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality

[X Acto]

Anrde,Krimel,

I think we all get different ideas when we concieve of "undefined" for the mind
is designed to define and distinguish. This also lends to it's indefinability, but,
since the mind is prone to distinction what we experience may be defined in
certain terms. These handels are all we have, so sorting out  and agreeing to
their meaning is a priority one would think.

Ron




________________________________
From: Krimel <krimel at krimel.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2009 8:03:09 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality

[Krimel]
OK but I don't think DQ is undefined. Quality is undefined. I think
Pirsig conflated the two out of enthusiasm and others follow out of
blind obedience.

Andre:
Hi Krimel, how can you say that DQ is not undefined? Where do you get the
idea from that there is a difference between DQ and Quality?

My understanding is that DQ and Quality are synonymous. I do think that DQ
is an unfortunate term because it suggests something about Quality. Quality
should remain undefined and free of/from any association with anything.

ZMM's Quality is Lila's DQ/SQ, no?

[Krimel]
The short answer would be, no.
ZMM is about Tao and Lila is about Yin and Yang.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/