[MD] Science Wars

[MarshaV]

At 12:14 PM 4/19/2009, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>I assume that you consider your patterns to be conventionally
>true.  I consider my patterns to be conventionally true.  Since there
>conventional truth (patterns) are relational and ever-changing and do
>not represent an Absolute Truth, I will let this post turn to dust in the
>wind.
>
>[Krimel]
>More or less... On the "less" side, I think that "conventional" true is
>shared truth. It requires the agreement of two or more. Or as Jesus might
>have said it arises when three or more are gathered in its name.
>Individually you and I may have idiosyncratic concepts and understandings
>which we do not share. In fact you could argue that all concepts are
>idiosyncratic. They are conventional only to the extent that we share them
>or derive them from the shared intellectual level of our culture.
>
>[Marsha]
>Besides, I totally melted with you story of TaBee story.  You are
>such a sweetheart!
>
>[Krimel]
>Thanks, but we both know I have a real tendency to be an ass much of the
>time.

Krimel,

By conventional truth I mean a pattern that is relational, 
ever-changing and conceptually constructed.  What of a conventional 
truth is shared?  Are you, six letters with some kind of relationship 
to crime, shared?


Marsha




.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.