[MD] Science Wars

[MarshaV]

At 01:15 PM 4/19/2009, you wrote:
>At 01:08 PM 4/19/2009, you wrote:
>>[Marsha]
>>By conventional truth I mean a pattern that is relational,
>>ever-changing and conceptually constructed.  What of a conventional
>>truth is shared?  Are you, six letters with some kind of relationship
>>to crime, shared?
>>
>>[Krimel]
>>Conventions may have those properties but a convention is shared. The term
>>has no meaning in the context of the individual. Letters are shared
>>conventions my explanation for the etymology of my name is likewise shared.
>>In short EVERYTHING about a "conventional truth" is shared. That is what
>>makes it conventional.
>
>Marsha:
>Can you name one static of pattern (meaning) that is shared 
>100%?    Each particular will have its little deviation.

Krimel,

I really would like to explore this.  Patterns, for me, are 
conventional truth.  Patterns are also affected by their relationship 
to other patterns.  I suppose here I would agree with Platt about the 
significance of the individual, but it not clear to me.  We once had 
a discussion about pattern:guitar, and as I remember it our guitar 
patterns were very different.

What did you have in mind as a conventional truth?


Marsha












>.
>_____________
>
>Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
>.
>.
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.