[MD] Science Wars
Ian Glendinning
ian.glendinning at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 07:52:18 PDT 2009
Marsha has said it already Platt,
Nothing wrong with a real free market, where players are not "forced"
to compete by those who keep score, but can choose enlightened
collaboration and co-creation amongst balanced interests -
intellectuals included (but not exclusively of course). Like real
Drawinian evolution.
God help us in any extreme case.
Ian
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:28 PM, MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
> At 09:58 AM 4/20/2009, you wrote:
>>
>> > Ultimately Marsha, yes trust. Reading intent into what people (even
>> > scientists) say and do, supported by experience at the touch points we
>> > do have access to, and by second hand trust (or authority) if that's
>> > all we can get. Even with "direct" experience we need to beware
>> > illusions and psychological "tricks".
>> >
>> > A competitive self-interested market view of every situation sure
>> > doesn't
>> > help.
>> > Ian
>>
>> I wonder what the alternative to the free market might be. A syndicate of
>> SOM intellectuals perhaps? God help us.
>
>
> Platt,
>
> The idea of the free market is a myth, a cruel joke. What we have now is a
> 'let's pretend' free market; it is used to deflect every effort to have a
> caring fair market. Maybe by opening up to an intelligent consideration of
> the seventh-generation, something better can be developed. Your either/or
> dichotomy is nonsense.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
> .
> _____________
>
> Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
> .
> .
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list