[MD] A Tiny Hominid With No Place on the Family Tree

[MarshaV]

Hi Platt,

I am not trying to discredit Evolution.  To me it means 'change' and 
that seems correct.  A more precise definition than that is a very 
interesting theory, with a few anomalies, and which already has a 
history of itself changing.   Intelligent Design is not credible 
science.  My concern is that science is blindly followed without an 
understanding of its danger points, and I am relieved that it is 
being challenged.  It should be properly evaluated and monitored by 
all citizens.


Marsha


At 05:59 PM 4/28/2009, you wrote:
>Marsha,
>
>The Darwinists are hard pressed to explain hobbits. The theory is now
>challenged from within. Wonders never cease.
>
>Platt
>
>On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:02 PM, MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > A Tiny Hominid With No Place on the Family Tree
> >
> > ...
> >
> > If the hobbit is a throwback to much earlier hominids, scientists said,
> > reverse evolution would be the most far-fetched explanation. Dr. Jungers, a
> > paleoanthropologist who organized the symposium, said there were no known
> > examples of mammals becoming significantly reduced in size and anatomy as a
> > consequence of reverting to an ancestral form.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?_r=1&8dpc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> > _____________
> >
> > Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
> > .
> > .
> >
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.