[MD] Science Wars
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Thu Apr 30 08:24:20 PDT 2009
At 11:13 AM 4/30/2009, you wrote:
>Marsha:
>
>The age of the universe would be shorter than the age of oldest stars. This
>contradiction implies that either 1) our measurement of the Hubble constant
>is incorrect, 2) the Big Bang theory is incorrect or 3) that we need a form
>of matter like a cosmological constant that implies an older age for a given
>observed expansion rate
>
>Hi Marsha,
>
>Or that there are/ have been more 'bangs'.?
>
>Andre
Bangettes? Do-lang-do-lang-do-lang...
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list