[MD] Philosophy and Philosophology

[Andre Broersen]

Bodvar to Ian:
I agree with using language's long-ingrained "intellectual" terms that
include mind and matter in normal discourse, but right now we are up
in the high country of metaphysics and yours about "future
possibilities of intellect" does not sound of MOQ understanding to me.

Andre:
Hi Bodvar, Ian.
Bodvar, can you please tell me what you mean by the last part of your
sentence...i.e. 'does not sound of MOQ understanding...'.

What, for you, are the indicators that lead you to conclude that someone
'understands' the MoQ?
(this, apart from the notion that intellect is the S/O aggregate).

Secondly, you seem to imply that 'static' means unchangeable/fixed. Is this
your understanding of the term static?

In anticipation,
Thank you
Andre the dud.