[MD] What a wonderful world

Wed Aug 5 09:08:38 PDT 2009

You offered your opinion, then I offered mine.  That is all...  

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of X Acto
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:06 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] What a wonderful world

that was before I understood your game

I will continue to read your posts

but I refuse to honor any more requests (bait) for any sort of explainations

explainations "would involve
definition of terms. An obviously 
unnecessary obligation once you "get it"."-John Carl
you made this point abundantly clear.

you ask for explainations with the idea already in mind that it is "not
this, not that"
why ask then? if you already have the answer, you already have your mind
made up.
making others jump through hoops to convince you of something you don't want
to 
be convinced of just to test your new rhetorical device is rude, you were
going to teach me a lesson 
and yes you did teach me a lesson.

a very clear one about how you operate.

I accept your humanity, however I do not accept your disingenuousness

You brought that post up of 01:57 PM 5/4/2009 with the idea of shooting it
down
 with smug delight not with any intention of actually reading what I had to
say.
When I asked you for your own explainations you got nasty made accusations
 and refused to answer Which leads me to believe you never had any intention
of discussing anything just putting me in my place and when that backfired
you had nothing to come back with except insults and accusations.

and of course..muskrat love

which I imagine from your use of it, must be pretty brutal

-

----- Original Message ----
From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 9:06:23 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] What a wonderful world

I confess, Ron, I am all too human.  Maybe you shouldn't read my posts.

Btw, here is the argument you said you were working on:

At 01:57 PM 5/4/2009, Ron wrote:
Marsha,
I'm still working on the "evidence", I have a rather half decent arguement
for
this position in the works but I feel we are both onto something, the
realization
that MoQ is an acultural conceptual pattern not so much a meta-intellectual
one
which is my arguement with Bo.
thnx!!    

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of X Acto
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 8:57 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] What a wonderful world

Andre,
we are all projecting, 

not this, not that    

implies that all is sacred

that no thing is sacred

but when these words are used selectivly

it defies and distorts their meaning

to say that science, religion, academia are not sacred

but then imply that MoQ, Quality, art, are

 then to demean anyone that says
otherwise

is missing the mark, and the meaning those words imply.

but those are my projections

and any may take from it what they will

-Ron

----- Original Message ----
From: Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 8:36:42 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] What a wonderful world

Ron to Marsha:
No thing is holy Marsha
all things are holy
that includes those things you like and dislike

Andre:
Interesting Ron, cos this is the way I interpreted Marsha's words. Perhaps I
was projecting?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/