[MD] Ironistic Metaphysics

[John Carl]

>
>
>>
> I don't understand the claims that metaphysics is unavoidable. Why must we
> call "not seeing a way to privilege one metaphysical system above all other
> possible views" itself a metaphysical view? Why not call this a
> post-metaphysical perspective?
>


Well a more accurate term would be "meta-metaphysical perspective".  But
some of us, not content with mere drinking and bar-girls, would want to get
even more meta and insist that meta-meta-metaphysics is the only way to go.


But there's really no need.  Metaphysics covers the whole shebang.

Yay metaphysics.

John




>
> Best,
> Steve
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>