[MD] The case for an Uncreated Source

[John Carl]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, markhsmit <markhsmit at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> OK, so you state that relationship is a form of time and visa versa.  I
> assume
> what you are talking about is the relationship of before and after, and
> that such a
> relationship is defined in terms of time; in the absence of time we
> couldn't
> draw such a relationship.



According to the Biocentric model, and straight thinking, time only exists
in the context of animal perception.



When you state that "time is a form of relationship...", perhaps it is up to
> you to explain
> what you mean.
>

Ok, what I meant was that time exists soley as a function of animal
perception - not as any sort of independent "thing".

Simple, succinct and logical.  I like it.

John