[MD] Rorty's Relativism

[MarshaV]

I thought the three sides were yes, no and all of the above, but maybe
that's is what you meant relative to relativism.  
 
Meeeeeoooooow...    
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Anders
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 12:15 PM
To: moq_discuss at lists.moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Rorty's Relativism

Relativism is absolutely right in it's limited definition. Value is a 
personal property, one side of the Quality.

But there are people who claim that they have got "absolute hearing". I 
don't believe in them either.
It wasn't so long ago compared to our DNA's history when normal A= 440, 
444 Hz or even 415 Hz.

There are three sides of the universe, not two.  Energy, pattern and 
dynamic freedom. Relativism is just about one of these.

It is an absolute truth, that cooperating individuals are getting more 
done than those who doesn't cooperate. Therefore we have nations and 
criminal gangs. Therefore nations yield more because they are more 
people with higher education and expertise.

It is an absolute truth that trade laws and rules of the game are more 
exciting than total anarchy. Therefore there are more people watching 
baseball than greenpeace actions. The better rules, the better thrill.

The doctrine that "there are no absolute truths" is just a funny 
self-denying statement.

Play on with the ball.

Jan-Anders


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/