[MD] Overturning Hierarchies

[John Carl]

This is a subject I've touched on many times as being at the heart of most
problems in the world and in the MoQ - issues with hierarchical dominance
patterns wherein Value is subordinated to hierarchical position instead of
the other way around like it should be.

Idolatry, in other words.

When you think you can fight because your belt is black, rather than
sporting a black belt earned through demonstration of your ability to fight.


Except of course, when fighting, nobody gives a damn about belt color or
degree earned or social accolades from weak academic mills of
ego-reinforcement;  all that matters is in the moment.


Thinking that it is ALWAYS more moral for the Doctor to kill the germ.  Even
if the Doctor is evil.

Getting caught up in a tangle of social communication vs intellectual
disputation that can NEVER be completely semantically untangled - A sloppy
cut with a dull knife is all that we could ever hope for in our splits
between human social patterns and human intellectual.

When a bright young man studies Physics so he can get a job, get married and
have kids, his intellect is striving to earn a high social position so he
can breed.  Who is really "highest" in this formulation and how does
assuming a 1,2,3,4 direction toward Quality actually serve Dynamic
Quality?   Other than a blind simplisticism?

Above are my questions and challenges.  Below  are my answers and solutions.

Morality is defined at all levels by "that which produces more DQ"  and
especially important is the big "D".  Those patterns which increase the
choices available are the higher quality patterns.  Thus intellectual
critique of society is moral because it increases the dynamic opportunity of
the society to choose.  It can now choose between change and not-change
because alternatives have been brought to its attention.  Any society that
suppresses the intellectual dynamic is immoral, but any society that
suppresses the social or biological dynamic is just as, if not more,
immoral.

Ultimately, Nature is the source of Quality and man's highest purpose is in
promoting and choosing the more dynamic on every level, and the purpose of
intellect is to serve this need and increase the dynamicism of Nature.

There is an immorality that increases with man's growing intellectual
distance from Nature.  This stems, I believe, from the roots of word,
language and culture that are based in Nature and natural relationships
which form the symbolic backdrop for man's understanding.

When the source is left far behind in abstraction and self-referent virtual
realities, bad  social patterns dominate.   Large corporations influence
worldviews for profit motive.   Value Free Metaphysics runs amok and for the
masses lacking values, the Giant's Machine is glad to provide a temporary
one - materialism.

Change is needed. More dynamic choices are available to be explicated.
Quality cannot be defined in words, only in life.  I guess if you wanna say
life=experience, then I'll go along with that -  Quality cannot be defined
in words, only in experience.

yeah.  Works for me.  Maybe I'll make it my mantra.  Need to shorten it up a
bit...  Quality is not words but experience.  Nah, that is defining Quality
in a word, "experience"  that doesn't work.  The key I left out there was
"defined"  The action of a definer or describer is what I'm defining and
describing.  Quality can't be described in words, only in experience.  Yeah,
that's pretty good.  That sums it up pretty simply and elegantly for me.
Maybe now I get it.  Krimel!  I've joined the AwGi cult!

Quality can be defined only in experience.