[MD] The relativity of the MoQ
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Sun Aug 30 05:13:57 PDT 2009
John:
Sorry Ham. I guess you'll have to set your sights a little lower if you
want to avoid such disappointments in the future. One question though. Why
are you here? I mean why are you and Platt not spending your time in the
discussion and explication of the philosophy of Randian Objectivism? I'm
sure there's a group of like-minded INDIVIDUALS out there where you can all
go and affirm your own intellect to each other.
Why anyone would be interested in such a circle-jerk is beyond my
imagination, but I'm sure they are out there.
Ron:
A collection of individuals? Ham sez they do not exist. in fact
engaging in this forum, for the ilk of
platt and Ham is hypicriticle, they themselves are engaging in a collective
social forum of the exchange of ideas.
stinkin collectivist in individuals clothing if you ask me.
> I'm also convinced more than ever that the nihilistic
> tilt of this forum makes an MoQ breakthrough highly unlikely.
>
> Good luck in finding a philosophical approach better suited to your
> intellect.
>
> --Ham
>
BTW, you do know what her followers called themselves, don't you? The
Collective. You should join. The flexibility of the human brain to be
ironic and hypocritical simultaneously would make a fascinating case study,
if nothing else.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list