[MD] The Death Panels
Horse
horse at darkstar.uk.net
Sun Aug 30 06:42:10 PDT 2009
Hi Guys
Thanks for joining in this conversation in a reasoned and reasonable way.
I kept coming up with the Palin link when I was looking for info on the
subject and figured that it was more or less her trying to muddy the
waters on an important debate. I think she also tried more of the same
with with some BS about the "Death Panels" relating to ones level of
productivity in society!
Arlo, I think you're quite right that this sort of contemptible nonsense
should be kept away from this forum and my thanks for challenging Platt
on the use of this emotive hyperbole. Your use of commentary, sarcasm
and irony (with a lot of exasperation thrown in) are obviously nothing
like those made by Nick some time back and I think it was inappropriate
of Platt to try and equate your actions with Nicks.
John, I can see your point about even with the best medical care in the
world people still die but the point about good healthcare for all is
that it is not purely a financial decision as to who gets treated and
who doesn't. Ian makes the point that medical personnel make life and
death decisions every day and will sometimes get it badly wrong - I
wouldn't like to be in their shoes and I think that reducing the
argument to insults and pejorative comments susch as "Death Panels" is
entirely immoral. Sure, everyone dies eventually but the problem with a
lack of proper healthcare provision is that many people die needlessly
because they have no means of access to care which would otherwise keep
them alive and this lack of access is caused by financial not ethical
decisions.
Thanks for the quotes Ham - although I don't see good healthcare for all
as an instance of creeping collectivism but an acknowledgement that the
right to life - and a reasonable quality of life - goes beyond who has
the biggest stick, mouth or bank balance. What I fail to understand here
is why so many Americans can't see the obvious in that you are unlikely
to be stuck with a single system of healthcare. As Ian has pointed out
you can have a mix of private and public healthcare with extra care
available if you opt for extra levels of insurance. If you want
non-critical surgery or treatment and can afford to pay for it then fair
enough but at least allow critical treatment to be available, in
principle, to all. That seems only fair in my book. If you think, as
Platt seems to, that the healthcare in the UK is so awful then why is it
that over here we aren't campaigning for better insurance but rather
better health service provided care. It's not perfect by a long shot but
for my money I would rather the system we have over here than the one
you currently have.
I think the majority of people on this list can see through the
stupidity of the "Death Panel" hype but it is a bit sad that it should
come up at all except to discuss it rationally and with the contempt it
deserves.
Cheers
Horse
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list