[MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

[X Acto]

Well John,
Quality is an abstract noun that tends to be reified in english sentences.

the language tends to treat it as a substantive.

-Ron


 


----- Original Message ----
From: John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 3:38:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

I've been stacking pipes on a hill. Conditions here are nice right now.
I've been thinking a bit about Bo too.

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:18 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

  Bo takes so much heat, and is so persistent

> and patient, that I just felt the need to support him.


Something today has me thinking along the same lines:  My objecting to
Objectivism.

It suddenly occured to me that turning the MoQ into an object might very
well be the crux of the problem that Bo expresses.  And my recent postings
from Ron, Platt and Ham, the randy-ian trinity of individualism (!) on the
matter made me aware of some dialectical opposition after all. (John's
prayers answered).




>  For me, the
> Intellectual Level is the subject/object level. I don't think Bo is
> confusing the pointing and the moon.  I think he sees the DQ/sq split
> changes everything, and I agree.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
Well I agree as well.  But the question is, for the better?  Or the worse?

John, back to stacking trash...
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/