[MD] [MD} The relativity of the MoQ

[John Carl]

Ok, then,  Much better it is.  I agree as well.  For me it overturns the
idea of a static hierarchical morality with a more flowing and
freedom-loving spirit.

Quality is an axis AND a direction and the direction is toward the more
dynamic on every level.  With the levels being relatively more dynamic in
their evolutionary escalation.  When intellect turns toward the dark side
(egoistic control of static patterns) then intellect is less moral than
rocks, regardless of its vaunted evolutionary possibility.

So I bet you don't think Quality is an object, do you Marsha?

John the objector, not the objectifier



On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:48 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
>
>   I think he sees the DQ/sq split
> > changes everything, and I agree.
> >
> >
> > Marsha
> >
> >
>
> John, the stacker:
> Well I agree as well.  But the question is, for the better?  Or the worse?
>
>
> John,
>
> Better!  Much better!!
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>