[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[Joseph Maurer]

On 11/29/09 10:55 PM, "markhsmit" <markhsmit at aol.com> wrote:

I was just pointing out another way of looking at things.
If one assumes that there is no creation, no big bang,
no creator, it puts a different spin on things.  I don't think
it is to unask the question, I think it's answering the question.
 
If we imagine existence to be perpetual, it changes a lot.
 
Hi Mark and all,

For individuality Ham wants me to picture negated essence.  For vision you
want me to imagine perpetual existence.  I think I will continue to try to
understand Pirsig¹s take on evolutionary existence.


> I was just pointing out another way of looking at things.
> If one assumes that there is no creation, no big bang,
> no creator, it puts a different spin on things.  I don't think
> it is to unask the question, I think it's answering the question.
> 
> If we imagine existence to be perpetual, it changes a lot.